The Geek Culture Forums
Ask a Geek! Which Linux, and why?
|
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Which Linux, and why? |
Danapoppa Geek Posts: 78 |
posted August 21, 2002 03:52
I'm looking to buy Linux for my SOHO server (an Athlon-based machine) and I was wondering if anybody could recommend one. I was thinking about Red Hat, but I've looked around the web a bit recently and want to consider other options before picking one. (I don't have time to fiddle about trying various flavors. I'm a translator and nobody pays me to play with my own computers.) My priorities are stability, security, and hardware compatibility. The package would have to be fairly recent to accommodate my VGA, which is a Radeon 7500 I picked up on a lark. If you have experience with Linux, please tell me which flavor you would recommend, and why. I would especially appreciate opinions from Linux gurus with experience of more than one flavor. ------------------ IP: Logged |
ilovemydualg4 Highlie Posts: 792 |
posted August 21, 2002 04:36
sorry, my experiences for experimenting are with yellow dog, linux ppc, and red hat. hate linuxppc, love yellowdog, red hat is good too. OF course i've never tried debian or anything else for x86 ------------------ IP: Logged |
Danapoppa Geek Posts: 78 |
posted August 21, 2002 05:11
Thanks for responding, DualG4. Someday I'll get around to putting Yellowdog on my G4. ------------------ IP: Logged |
SpikeSpiegel Uber Geek Posts: 841 |
posted August 21, 2002 05:12
you forgot to explain why dual ------------------ IP: Logged |
Alien Investor Highlie Posts: 500 |
posted August 21, 2002 07:12
Disclosure: I used to work for Red Hat, and I still own RHAT stock. I'm biased. Red Hat is a good default distro. It just works, and as of Red Hat 7, it's secure out of the box (namely, all incoming TCP connections are disabled, and then you re-enable anything you need if you want to run your own web server). Red Hat is good for minimizing the time you spend fussing with your installation. I don't know how good the hardware compatibility is compared to Mandrake or Debian. Red Hat has a hardware compatibility list here: On the minus side, Red Hat has a low geek-coolness factor these days. IP: Logged |
TheAnnoyedCockroach Uber Geek Posts: 833 |
posted August 21, 2002 08:38
I'm running Mandrake 8.1. They recently released 8.2, though. It's cheaper than Red Hat. That is all. ------------------ IP: Logged |
maxomai Alpha Geek Posts: 264 |
posted August 21, 2002 09:47
Red Hat. Why? Because that's what I started with and because I've grown used to it. It's as familiar to me as my favorite jacket. However, RH comes with i386 binary rpms .. which means you may not get the most out of your hardware unless you recompile everything from src rpms. IP: Logged |
ilovemydualg4 Highlie Posts: 792 |
posted August 21, 2002 10:55
why do i like yellow dog better than linuxppc? easier to install ------------------ IP: Logged |
Lex Super Geek Posts: 250 |
posted August 21, 2002 11:16
Mandrake was what I started with, so I'm going to have to recommend it. I haven't tried Mandrake PPC, but it might be worth looking into. IP: Logged |
GameMaster Highlie Posts: 676 |
posted August 21, 2002 21:09
Red Hat (easy to install and customize, good documentation and I hear their support is good (although I haven't needed support yet)), Lindows (in a few years (not yet, it still has a few to many dugs)) or Caldara OpenLinux (Greatest install, it lets you play tetris while the pakages are installing in the final stage). RedHat seems to come with the most GPL'd software of any corprate distro (that I've seen), and is my favorite by far. Lindows has some exciting things going on, but it really is designed for desktops and you'd have to find and download the server side stuff you need seperatly. Although if your not willing to let go of MS Office, it's a good place to start. I've not played with Debaine much, but I hear good things... The problem with Debaine (at least for me) is that I have trouble finding a book or box version of it, and I don't have the connection to Download a larg distro. Slackware is nice and slim... I haven't played with it for quite some time, but when I did it was too slim to do a lot of the things I was looking for. My vote goes to Redhat. IP: Logged |
All times are Pacific Time | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
� 2002 Geek Culture� All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e