        |
|
|
 The Geek Culture Forums
 Your News!
 Anyone actually read warning labels?
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Anyone actually read warning labels? |
|
homesalad Super Geek  
Posts: 216 |
posted January 23, 2002 17:31
   
Well, I don't, but I had a friend over to the house, and she started reading all the labels on the glues, and epoxies that I use for boat-building. Here's my favorite: This product contains a chemical known in the state of California to cause cancer Hmmm...maybe there are some benifits to not leaving your computer screen all day. Needless to say, I went to the store and bought a box of latex gloves to use while glueing. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Dahak Mini-Geek
Posts: 51 |
posted January 23, 2002 18:05
"This product contains a chemical known in the state of California to cause cancer" You should be safe enough. Apparently it only causes cancer if you're in California. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
macadddikt18 SuperBlabberMouth!     
Posts: 1126 |
posted January 23, 2002 18:53
Humm, what does a monitor have to do with glue in Californa? Nayt ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
platypus Super Geek
Posts: 198 |
posted January 23, 2002 21:52
People in California like to sniff glue while using the computer. or... soemthing... ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
joliet_jane Super Geek
Posts: 140 |
posted January 23, 2002 22:00
I almost never read warning labels because they usually say obvious things like "Do not consume" or "do not use outdoors" or some other thing you'd have to be a moron to do. This is crying wolf-- what if it is an actual warning for something rational people don't do? IP: Logged |
|
LifetimeTrekker Alpha Geek Posts: 326 |
posted January 23, 2002 23:18
quote: Exactly, dear! Sleeping pills with the warning against driving or operating heavy machinery after taking them. Electrical appliances with the warning not to immerse in water. The warning on windshield screens: Do not attempt to drive with screen in place. Maybe we should bring back the definition of resonability to society? Some basic level of personal responsibility that each of us must meet before damages can be awarded in court? IP: Logged |
|
macadddikt18 SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1126 |
posted January 24, 2002 05:50
I don't think it is responsibilty but more so common sence. then again it is said that common sence is very uncommon. Nayt ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Geordie Super Geek
Posts: 148 |
posted January 24, 2002 07:23
Lots of great warnings over at Dumb Warnings. For an amusing collection of warning labels that the web author would have liked to have seen before certain events in his life transpired see Personal Injury Warning System. IP: Logged |
|
Pish-Tush Neat Newbie 
Posts: 14 |
posted January 24, 2002 07:26
Quoth LifetimeTrekker quote: We've seen a number of cases recently where teenage tennis (and the like) stars have been declared legally adult to protect them from exploitative parents. How about having the converse where the courts are empowered to declare those who bring ridiculous lawsuits as legal minors. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
FatGnome Geek
Posts: 72 |
posted January 24, 2002 11:05
quote: Yeah sounds reasonable to me. heh heh. Who would become the guardians though? No one wants a stupid child. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Dahak Mini-Geek
Posts: 51 |
posted January 24, 2002 11:41
This topic reminds me of a story I saw not long ago on Yahoo!'s Reuters feed, where a European Central Bank board member actually felt the need to warn people to not eat euro bills. Apparently the ink used is toxic in large quantities (as in you'd have to eat four hundred bills or so to get sick.) As Senor Domingo Solans (the aformentioned board member) put it, "``There is a product in the ink which, if you ingest 400 notes become toxic. So, besides being expensive, it is not recommendable to eat euro notes.''
------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Eponine Highlie 
Posts: 726 |
posted January 24, 2002 14:12
You know the scary thing about these warnings is, that at some point during the product testing, *someone* did what they were warning about. That just frightens me. IP: Logged |
|
+Andrew Super Geek
Posts: 198 |
posted January 24, 2002 18:22
quote: More likely than that is that some idiot did whatever it is the warning forbids, sued the company, and won. Take for example, the incident with the woman and her too-hot McDonald's coffee. Such labels, though obvious, apparently deflect liability since companies can say "See, we told you right there not to do that!" when faced with ridiculous lawsuits. -Andrew IP: Logged |
|
macadddikt18 SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1126 |
posted January 24, 2002 18:38
kinda reminds me when my manager at work said not to eat to many pan pizza's right after they get done rising do to the wine used to make them. Be it you would have to eat about 40 or 50 large pans for that to happen, he still felt the need to warn us. LIke anyone could eat 50 large pans in one sitting, i can hardly eat one. Nayt ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
homesalad Super Geek
Posts: 216 |
posted January 24, 2002 20:43
yeah, people are just dumb. Ay any rate I dug up the 'ole respirator before getting to work today. How nice it is to breathe clean air... IP: Logged |
|
macadddikt18 SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1126 |
posted January 25, 2002 05:18
Now see, if you lived out in rural canada you would have clean air more often. I enjoy that clean air a lot. Nayt ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
homesalad Super Geek
Posts: 216 |
posted January 25, 2002 18:42
well, we do get a lot of clean air here in (rural) western washington, just not in the shop! IP: Logged |
|
Janeway Super Geek
Posts: 234 |
posted January 26, 2002 11:49
A good warning label for diet pills: "Not to be taken lightly." Sorry, this popped into my head as I was reading and couldn't resist. IP: Logged |
|
macadddikt18 SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1126 |
posted January 26, 2002 11:55
Ok that was kidna funny. Nayt ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Evilbunny Highlie
Posts: 614 |
posted January 26, 2002 22:35
You know what I hate? On bags of Doritos they put things like, "win a car!" No purchase nessary, details inside. So what are you supposed to do, rip open the bag while in the store and see if you won? IP: Logged |
|
EngrBohn Highlie
Posts: 686 |
posted January 27, 2002 03:06
Typically, when there's "no purchase necessary", it means you can send a SASE to get a game piece. The one I'm trying to figure out, though, is the latest Hershey's promotion. They'll have people at store exits, and if a randomly-selected person walks out with a Hershey's bar, they win an SUV. No purchase necessary. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Steen SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1162 |
posted January 27, 2002 15:26
EngrBohn wrote: The one I'm trying to figure out, though, is the latest Hershey's promotion. They'll have people at store exits, and if a randomly-selected person walks out with a Hershey's bar, they win an SUV. No purchase necessary. That's easy... you can still win even if you shoplifted the candy bar IP: Logged |
|
ZorroTheFox SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1117 |
posted January 27, 2002 18:19
warning labels are great, the best part is knowing that some idiot out there did the very thing they made the label for........Z IP: Logged |
|
Swiss Mercenary BlabberMouth, the Next Generation.
Posts: 1461 |
posted January 28, 2002 04:09
The one I always remember was one of those stepladders. It said: Do not use on icy slopes. What gets me is that I can just see someone stupid enough to open up a step ladder and use it on an icy slope. IP: Logged |
|
EngrBohn Highlie
Posts: 686 |
posted January 28, 2002 05:19
We've noticed that smoke detectors come with batteries these days (as opposed to "batteries not included). My wife commented that it was a Good Thing, since it meant the smoke detectors were much more likely to be used. My suggestion, though, was that it was pure economics: The cost of including one battery with every smoke detector, combined, was probably less than the legal fees involved in waiting for the judge to laugh at the the plantiff for even one lawsuit of "Gee, I didn't know it needed batteries". ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
macadddikt18 SuperBlabberMouth!
Posts: 1126 |
posted January 28, 2002 18:51
I think it was best said this way," Common sence is very uncommon" Nayt ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are Pacific Time | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
� 2002 Geek Culture� All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e
|
