Author

Topic: How would you solve this problem?

AgingAmigaoid
Mini Geek
Member # 764
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 13:39
I'm not looking for an answer, I'm looking for a discussion of the process and a discussion of the best way to teach the process.
First Generalized
y+x = z Solve for x
We want to move y to the other side of the equation so substract y from both sides of the equation.
yy+x = zy
x = zy
Next one
3+x = 7 Solve for x
Again, we want to move 3 to the other side of the equation so subtract 3 from both sides of the equation.
33+x = 73
x = 4
Now! The point of contention!
(3)+x = 7 Solve for x
We want to move 3 to the other side of the equation so... subtract 3 from both sides of the equation.
(3)(3)+x = 7(3)
x = 10
There are those who say, "Since you are moving a negative number then you add the positive value." So
(3)+3+x = 7 + 3
x = 10
Let me state that I understand that (3)(3) is the same as (3)+3 what I disagree with is why, just because it's 3, do we want to change the "subtract y from both sides of the equation" rule to say, "subtract y from both sides of the equation unless y is negative in which case you should add the positive value of y to both sides of the equation" It gives the rule a messy "except when...." clause that is completely, mathematically, unnecessary.
So my question to the assembled geeks is, in your mind when you do the problem do you convert (3) to 3 and then add it or do you subtract (3)?
I substract (3) while others say I'm "adding a step." I say others are doing the step "in their head" and calling it a "special case rule."
In the end, for teaching, I like the simple, clean, "subtract y from both sides of the equation," which works for any value of y.
Posts: 83  Registered: Apr 2001
 IP: Logged


Black Widow
Uber Geek
Member # 3046

posted December 07, 2006 13:56
So my question to the assembled geeks is, in your mind when you do the problem do you convert (3) to 3 and then add it or do you subtract (3)?
Simple answer: convert (3) to 3 and then add it
A bit longer: when doing that problem in my head, I "take off" the 3 in front of the +x, and +3 to the 7 on the other side. There is no +3 to the 3 in front of the +x. I just outright dispose of it.
Gah I hope that makes sense. It does in my mind.
Posts: 931  From: Missouri  Registered: Oct 2004
 IP: Logged


spungo
BlabberMouth, a Blabber Odyssey
Member # 1089
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 13:57
I would just say
(3) + x = 7
is the same as
x  3 = 7
then the whole adding or subtracting thing becomes more logical.
If you try to instruct with rules on such matters, you risk hindering your pupils' ability to think more clearly about problems. I see this all the time with folk trying to solve differential equations  they keep asking about "integrating factors", and understanding their rote instruction, when if you just use a bit of common sense, it's a lot easier.
Anyway, that's my 2 bits... although, no doubt, it's worth much less than that.
 Shameless plug. (Please forgive me.)
Posts: 6529  From: Noba Scoba  Registered: Jan 2002
 IP: Logged


Ashitaka
SuperFan!
Member # 4924
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 14:21
In doing such algerbra I would say I first just add all like terms and set the equation equal to what I want to solve for (x) or zero. This is just to get an overview. I then solve and rearrange the equation as I need.
I don't know how to answer your question though. In your example problem I do not do any algerbra. I just see that x must be ten.
 "If they're not gonna make a distinction between Muslims and violent extremists, then why should I take the time to distinguish between decent, fearful white people and racists?"
Assif Mandvi
Posts: 3089  From: Switzerland  Registered: Feb 2006
 IP: Logged


nerdwithnofriends
Uber Geek
Member # 3773

posted December 07, 2006 16:24
Having just gotten out of an assembly programming final, I think I'll be fecetios on this one:
If we represent 3 as a binary (2's complement) number, we don't care about adding or subtracting; the beauty of twos complement is that it requires only one arithmetic operation for both positive and negative numbers.
 "The Buddha, the Godhead, resides quite as comfortably in the circuits of a digital computer or the gears of a cycle transmission as he does at the top of a mountain or in the petals of a flower."  Robert M. Pirsig
Posts: 948  Registered: Mar 2005
 IP: Logged


stevenback7
SuperBlabberMouth!
Member # 5114
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 16:31
your making such things to hard by putting the negative integers in brackets. That is how you make mistakes. I know if i put all my negative numbers in brackets and stuff then i first of all i would be adding like 10 extra lines to my problem and the chance of me accidently making a mistake because of the signs basically triples.
 Comic Book Guy: There is no emoticon for what i'm feeling.
Posts: 1199  From: Canada eh?  Registered: May 2006
 IP: Logged


Jace Raven
Solid Nitrozanium SuperFan!
Member # 2444

posted December 07, 2006 17:48
If you know that a negative and a negative make a positive
x  3 = 7
can be written as
x + (3) = 7
Essentially (as I understand it and it's been a while) the combination of two numbers, adding or subtracting, can be simplified to the addition of a positive or negative intiger. That's why if you subtract a negative from anything you're adding the difference in value. In this case 3  (3) or 3 + (1)(3). This is the logic behind distributing the negative to a grouped item and to be honest I prefer to add terms not subtract them.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I am by no means a math wizard.
Posts: 1791  Registered: Nov 2003
 IP: Logged


Xanthine
Solid Nitrozanium SuperFan!
Member # 736
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 18:05
Looks okay Jace, but a negative multiplied by a negative goes positive.
The way I finally came to understand algebra is this (And believe me, it was an almighty battle): you are trying to isolate x. Everything on the x side of the equation needs to get moved to the other side, so whatever happens to the x side also happens to the other side. If you add on one side, you ad on the other. If you subtract on one side, you subtract on the other. You do whatever you need to do to isolate x, but you have do it to the other side as well.
 And it's one, two, three / On the wrong side of the lee / What were you meant for? / What were you meant for?  The Decemberists
Posts: 7670  From: the lab  Registered: Mar 2001
 IP: Logged


Jace Raven
Solid Nitrozanium SuperFan!
Member # 2444

posted December 07, 2006 18:11
Oh. I know Xan. It was the only way I could express my point
Posts: 1791  Registered: Nov 2003
 IP: Logged


TheTech
Geek
Member # 2506
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 18:42
Jaces first equation X3=7
is probably the best way to teach it ... use the cummutative property of addition and get all the variables on the left. This is easier when you are dealing with
2+x5=7 x+25=7 ... get the x on the left x3=7
As one my profs. liked to say "At This point the solution is trivial"
Dave
Posts: 128  From: Third Stone from the Sun  Registered: Dec 2003
 IP: Logged


Xanthine
Solid Nitrozanium SuperFan!
Member # 736
Member Rated:

posted December 07, 2006 20:51
I had a couple profs who used to say that. Occasionally I even agreed with them.
 And it's one, two, three / On the wrong side of the lee / What were you meant for? / What were you meant for?  The Decemberists
Posts: 7670  From: the lab  Registered: Mar 2001
 IP: Logged


Richard Wolf VI
SuperBlabberMouth!
Member # 4993

posted January 17, 2007 08:40
It's quite simple: The only thing you are doing to solve this equation is adding the opposite of y on both sides in order to cancel it in the side where x is. So in the case y is positive, its opposite is negative and viceversa.
 The same old iWanToUseaMac... Who am I fooling? I'm getting a Wii now, iWanToUseaMac isn't :P Get Opera. The best web experience. Contest. Group. Success.
Posts: 1356  From: Bogotá, Colombia  Registered: Mar 2006
 IP: Logged


ZER
GeekinTraining
Member # 7171
Rate Member

posted February 13, 2007 10:35
I would burn the math book and throw a stick of dynamite in the ashes.
But thats just me.
 ...
Posts: 33  From: Hacker Land  Registered: Feb 2007
 IP: Logged


