|
T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Snaggy
Member # 123
|
 posted June 16, 2008 12:54
Just in case you wanted to know...
http://www.oneplusyou.com/bb/fight5
I could take 20.
|
CrawGator
Member # 392
|
posted June 16, 2008 13:33
18
|
Stereo
Member # 748
|
posted June 16, 2008 13:43
15, they say. They don't know the power of story-telling and game-making, because I could handle a lot more than that! Add a little nursery song, and it's hundreds I can handle! Until their parents come to pick them up, that is.
Just yelling "who wants a big hug and lots of wet kisses?" is enough to disable a good number - and make the others line up. I'm an auntie or big cousin to enough kids to know how to make 5-years old flee. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
"A good fighter can fight a hundred fights and win them all. A great fighter can win a hundred fights without figting." (Or something along that.)
|
Ashitaka
Member # 4924
|
posted June 16, 2008 13:49
24
|
geekygoddess
Member # 15702
|
posted June 16, 2008 14:03
15!!! What is that about???
|
SpazGirl
Member # 4915
|
posted June 16, 2008 15:03
I could take 25... hmm...
|
toobe
Member # 3783
|
posted June 16, 2008 15:59
22. Although I know from experience (read: my girlfriend's son jumping on my head in the middle of the night) that I can barely even take down one.
|
Xanthine
Member # 736
|
posted June 16, 2008 17:17
18.
I wonder if they are taking into account the complete and utter indestructibility of a five year old, especially if said five year-old thinks they're having fun. Seriously. I've watched the kids at aikido and they just *bounce*.
|
Serenak
Member # 2950
|
posted June 16, 2008 17:24
Ha - a weedy - but probably more realistic 6
C'mon you could seriously use a little kid as a weapon? If we are talking rabid zombie kiddies maybe - otherwise who are you kidding (pun intended)
|
macmcseboy
Member # 1232
|
posted June 16, 2008 17:28
I can take on 23.
|
iWanToUseaMac
Member # 4993
|
posted June 16, 2008 17:57
23 too for me. I guess I can thank some of my Taekwondo training so far.
|
drunkennewfiemidget
Member # 2814
|
posted June 17, 2008 05:50
27. Bring it.
|
NoRealReason
Member # 6992
|
posted June 17, 2008 08:22
28.
Stinkin pre-schoolers!
|
Metasquares
Member # 4441
|
posted June 17, 2008 19:20
25.
|
Anovadea
Member # 15588
|
posted June 17, 2008 20:29
They say 22... but I dunno... those kids can fight rough!
|
deadpool
Member # 19617
|
posted July 10, 2008 08:45
You could take on 36 five year old kids in a fight.
w00t! ![[devil wand]](graemlins/devilwand.gif)
|
tweety
Member # 3890
|
posted July 10, 2008 09:50
13 – 18 depending on how dirty I fight.
But, hey, I've pushed around (read: serious blowout) an older brother who at the time was twice my weight (more likely 3x at this point due to my own shaping up). Also, I have a much younger brother (by 8 years), and I've been the referee (read: jungle gym) at a few of his b-day parties way back when. I think that if at 13 or 14 I could handle 20 5 and 6 year olds climbing all over me without catastrophic system failure, I think I'd do pretty well today. Hey, I'm taller, leaner, more muscular, and grouchier.
If you really want to be able to take on those little buggers, just remember, at 5 they're still young enough to be replaced. ![[evil]](graemlins/evil.gif)
|
AntonTakk
Member # 4686
|
posted July 11, 2008 12:05
34 - i'm not the caring type, thou they say that will change when I have kids of my own, but that would just give me an ally in the fight, i'd need to train the little bugger thou
deadpool - we should team up! 70 5 year olds!
AT
|
Steen
Member # 170
|
posted July 11, 2008 12:28
I think the test vastly underestimates two things:
1) The possibilities encompassed by the phrase "fighting dirty"
2) My willingess to use explosives
|
AntonTakk
Member # 4686
|
posted July 11, 2008 12:54
quote:
Originally posted by Steen:
2) My willingess to use explosives
wouldn't explosives fall under the category of weapons? of which there are none?, except possibly a five year old used as a weapon?
|
geekygoddess
Member # 15702
|
posted July 11, 2008 13:01
You sickos!!! These are innocent children we are talking about here. Oh, the humanity!!!
|
Steen
Member # 170
|
posted July 11, 2008 13:50
AntonTakk wrote:
wouldn't explosives fall under the category of weapons? of which there are none?, except possibly a five year old used as a weapon?
Fighting dirty is all about breaking the rules
|
Steen
Member # 170
|
posted July 11, 2008 13:54
geekygoddess wrote:
You sickos!!! These are innocent children we are talking about here. Oh, the humanity!!!
I had to do that
|
AntonTakk
Member # 4686
|
posted July 11, 2008 14:06
what about turning a 5 year old in to a bomb?
or creating a bone knife, or using a femur as a club?
|
